The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has voiced strong disapproval over reports that a Federal High Court judge allegedly ordered a defence lawyer to kneel during proceedings, calling the action inconsistent with judicial standards and the dignity of the legal profession.
The incident reportedly occurred during the trial of activist Omoyele Sowore, who is facing charges brought by the Department of State Services (DSS) over alleged cyber-related offences. According to reports, Justice Mohammed Umar admonished lead defence counsel, Marshall Abubakar, over his tone in court and allegedly instructed him to “come out and kneel down.” Other legal practitioners present intervened before the judge adjourned the case.
In a statement issued on Monday, NBA President Afam Osigwe said the reported order raised serious concerns about courtroom decorum and respect for due process. “The courtroom is a temple of justice, governed by law, procedure, and professional ethics,” the statement read, adding that judicial authority must always operate within legal limits.
While acknowledging the power of judges to maintain order, the NBA stressed that compelling a lawyer to kneel is not recognised under Nigerian law and falls outside acceptable judicial conduct. The association noted that contempt powers exist but must follow established procedures that protect fairness and uphold the rights and dignity of all parties involved.
The NBA also reminded lawyers of their responsibilities to maintain decorum, urging that advocacy, no matter how vigorous, should remain courteous and within the bounds of professional ethics.
Reacting to the reports, Sowore criticised the alleged directive on X, questioning the state of justice in Nigeria, and affirmed that his lawyer resisted the order. Human rights lawyer Inibehe Effiong condemned the move as “unacceptable,” noting that corporal gestures have no place in a courtroom.
The NBA concluded by affirming its commitment to safeguarding professional standards, judicial ethics, and the rule of law, urging that any complaints about courtroom incidents be addressed through proper institutional channels.